Showing posts with label instincts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label instincts. Show all posts

5/8/22

The Lonely Bachelor: A Story About Vulnerability

I've noticed an interesting trend among my clients; particularly those who come to therapy because of a maladaptive behavior that's getting in their way. Often even if they've identified the problem and are motivated to change, they feel powerless. After experiencing disappointment over and over, they mostly believe that change is impossible. Clients with this mindset usually come to their first session looking defeated, skeptical, and often having already predicted that I won’t be able to help them. One of the first interventions I use with these clients is the Empathy Equation. Here's an example.

A client, let's call him Andrew, was a 40-year-old bachelor who was fed up with his long history of failed relationships. At our first session, Andrew said his goal was to learn how to be "less picky" about the women he chose to date. According to his assessment, the problem with his love life was that his standards were too high. He thought if he could learn how to settle for less attractive, successful, and confident women, he might finally find a long term partner. 

Naturally, I was struck by his automatic l assumption that the only thing he had the power to change were his expectations. While I agreed that he had unrealistic expectations, his pickiness didn’t seem to be the heart of the matter. After building trust, I gently encouraged him to tell me his story. Together, we discovered several traumatic events and abandonments early in his life that he had never validated or processed. He was forced to be the "man of the house" and the breadwinner in a rough city at a very young age. It had trained him to project confidence, hyper-masculinity, and perfection at all times to keep from getting stabbed in the back. The business he got involved in just to keep food on the table had required constant bravado and intimidation. Unfortunately, this habit had continued in his dating life. 

Andrew was baffled by the rejections that kept happening despite his best efforts. It would go like this: He'd meet a woman, hoping she'd finally be "the one". He'd spend their first couple dates trying desperately to impress her. He'd show off his spotless, chic apartment and wear clothes carefully chosen to flatter his body. He would brag about his career success, portray himself as fun and carefree, and tell his date about how many people relied on his wisdom and support.

His strategy of projecting absolute perfection inevitably backfired, though. Shocking, I know. If he didn't alienate the woman he was wooing with false arrogance, he would spiral as soon as any vulnerability was required. If she asked him about something he perceived to be a weakness, he would instantly feel humiliated and inadequate. To make the pain more bearable, he'd quickly pivot and identify a flaw in his date. He'd then fixate on it until he'd convinced himself that SHE wasn't good enough for HIM. Thus emerged his theory that his standards were simply too high. 

Andrew's denial about his shame had completely blinded him to the true cause of his relationship troubles. Even after identifying the true issue, several more weeks went by, the cycle playing out again and again. I suspect that deep down, Andrew was still holding out hope that his perfection gambit might work if he just tried hard enough. Finally, however, he was ready to accept the truth: His outdated defense mechanisms were pushing him to withhold empathy from others, and more importantly, from himself.

As the insight grew, he quietly told me a deeper version of his story. He said he'd only survived his traumatic childhood by using bravado to bluff his way out of danger. He had to pretend that he wasn’t wounded. There was no room for mistakes or weakness. As an adult, he’d just continued bragging, competing, and posturing to prove himself. Considering how much professional success it had brought him, the idea of intentionally letting down his guard felt completely counterintuitive. His inner caveman was driving the train. Cognitively, Andrew understood the problem, but when he had opportunities to show vulnerability, he would revert to his old habit and put up a front. 

The first few times he tried to go against his instincts, he had panic attacks, but he kept trying. Slowly but surely, the facade came down, revealing a much more relatable human underneath. By the end of our time working together he was in the longest relationship he’d ever been in. Not only had his love life improved, but the symptoms of depression and anxiety he'd felt for most of his life were significantly reduced.

So what exactly happened? Andrew had started out by noticing the feelings, beliefs and behaviors that were getting in his way. He'd been listening to the inner caveman for so long, he'd confused his behaviors with his identity. But as he started to investigate how his origin story had impacted him, the puzzle pieces fell together. Suddenly his frustrating feelings and habits made sense. Once he understood himself (aka learned self-empathy), he realized he wasn't trapped reacting the old way.

As he learned to have compassion on himself, he gained confidence that the true version of him could be known and loved. By detaching his unhelpful behaviors from his identity, he had the power to choose a different strategy than the one that had been sabotaging him for so long. Much like in my experience with the Bieber Incident, the Empathy Equation helped Andrew reach a deeper understanding of what he was feeling (shame, judgment), believing (survival requires perfection), and behaving (sabotage of intimacy). Once he had accessed self empathy, he gained control of himself.

4/2/22

The Inner Caveman

In comic books (and in the over-abundance of movies based on them), both heroes and villains alike are given origin stories. They offer the reader or viewer a peek into the character’s troubled past, setting the stage for present-day drama. A lot of characters have surprisingly traumatic back-stories, the more heart-wrenching the better. Some are orphaned in a horrific way, falsely imprisoned, or their dog is killed by a home invader. Sometimes they just fall into a giant vat of acid.

Regardless of the details, an origin story’s purpose is to explain that character’s motivations. Their beliefs and choices, justified or not, can be understood more deeply once you’ve learned their origin story. Often, characters you wouldn’t have connected with emotionally become more endearing once you discover their tragic backstories. It explains why they are the way they are.

With intentional empathy, our first task is to learn the origin story of the person or group that we’re trying to understand. Since all humans have the same ancient origin in common (sorry, evolution deniers), let’s begin there. Investigating humanity’s origin story is to ask the question: Why are we the way we are?

One of my favorite authors, David Eagleman says in his book, Incognito, “Brains are like representative democracies. They are built of multiple, overlapping experts who weigh in and compete over different choices. [...] There is an ongoing conversation among the different factions in your brain, each competing to control the single output channel of your behavior.” One of these competing representatives, who often plays an antagonistic role in our modern-day functioning is a guy I like to call “the inner caveman.” 

The inner caveman represents a vital part of our humanity that has been passed down from millennia to millennia, keeping us alive with his primal instincts. Sigmund Freud called this primitive part of our minds the “Id”, an unconscious drive toward sex, aggression, and survival.

I picture the inner caveman as a rather unintelligent chap who likes to grunt his advice on how to solve our problems in the simplest way possible. He's impulsive, aggressive, and easily provoked because his only focus is on meeting our basic needs for safety, food, and shelter. Oh, and satiating our compulsion to procreate find things to dominate. I hate to say it, but he pretty much invented sexism and racism.

Unsophisticated though he may be, our inner caveman is the one who alerts us to our primal needs. In fact, he gets a lot of the credit for our survival as a species (so far). Unfortunately, his gloriously simple approach to life hasn’t adapted very well to the modern world. The threats and challenges that humans face have changed dramatically since the inner caveman was in his prime. 

Today our survival relies less on hunting, mating, and defeating rival tribes, and more on our ability to communicate complex ideas and collaborate with other tribes. Humanity’s new survival strategy looks drastically different from the inner caveman’s. "Many woman, much meat, more war" isn't going to hack it anymore. Nowadays the inner caveman is often irritable, stubbornly trying to use his ancient strategies in a world that is exponentially more complex.

Fortunately for us, the inner caveman is capable of adapting. Even if it does take him a lot longer than we would like. The poor fellow has had a rough couple of centuries, what with women being allowed to speak, no one wanting to be slaves anymore, and things like violence and rape being generally frowned upon. Since we can’t just delete the inner caveman from our DNA, and ignoring him isn't working, we need to learn how to work with him.

Eagleman’s democracy of brain representatives I mentioned earlier symbolizes our ability to acknowledge the inner caveman’s impulses while also listening to voices of reason. No single representative, including the inner caveman, has control over our choices. That’s great news! When the inner caveman grunts for us to give in to our base instincts, other representatives (maybe our inner scientist, inner accountant, or inner nurturer) have the chance to offer alternative perspectives.

If you think you’re pretty good at empathy, you have either (1) learned how to negotiate well with your inner caveman, or (2) you’re completely delusional. False dichotomies aside, the truth is we can’t just deny that we have an inner caveman. No matter how hard we pretend, he still hasn't transformed into the hot prince at the end of Beauty and the Beast. He’s here. He’s queer-phobic. Get used to it.

Before we can collectively create a culture of empathy where we can start working together to survive, we’ve got to address the reality of our inner caveman. As long as we refuse to admit that we have a racist, sexist, warmonger fused into our DNA, we’re sabotaging ourselves. Ignorance keeps us stubbornly justifying our outdated intuitions. If we give ourselves permission to acknowledge that the inner caveman exists, however, we can start actively choosing not to be so swayed by his vote. 

How do we accomplish such a thing you ask? Hint: It's what this blog is about. Stay tuned.

- Anna

Sources: